Would Jesus get a tattoo? Chuck Colsen seems to know the answer. And I disagree! (Especially since I have a tattoo!) I never thought I would find myself disagreeing with the likes of Chuck Colsen. So much of his writing has been a great help to me personally. However, I think he has fallen short in his recent blog about Christians and tattoos. In his article, he seems to present 4 arguments against Christians getting tattoos. I think all four arguments fall short. Here is my response….
1. First off, Colsen argues that Christians should avoid mimicking pagans or unbelievers in this world. God wants us to be set apart. And further we should not “carve graffiti” on our bodies as our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit. Of course, I agree that we should be set apart. However, Scripture is clear that this difference is meant to be displayed in our lifestyle not merely in our physical appearance. (James 1:19-27)
And where is the line when it comes to mimicking pagan culture. Can we listen to the same music? Can we dress like them? Can we talk like them? Can we drive the same kind of cars? Or is everything in our life supposed to be different? Does God really want us to create what amounts to a Christian culture that is so different from the world that any unbeliever could spot us a block away? I seriously doubt this is God’s desire even though many believers seem intent on doing this very thing.
The apostle Paul seemed to also disagree with Colsen on this point. In 1 Corinthians 9:19-23, Paul suggests that we adopt some of the practices of the unbelievers around us in order to win them over. He does not mean that we adopt blatantly sinful practices. He means that for grey area issues we have freedom to express ourselves like that of the culture we are trying to reach in order to win them over. It is a pragmatic missiological strategy. It is hard to reach a group of people if they cannot relate to you. So if getting a tattoo will somehow enhance our ability to share the gospel with this generation then we should all be getting tattoos according to Paul.
Ultimately, this issue of tattoo’s (and body piercing) falls into the category of culture. Culture changes. So believers have the freedom to change how we adorn ourselves. In fact, we should change. If we don’t we risk irrelevancy in the mission field. Colsen mentions a savage with tattoos in the book Moby Dick. The question that Colsen has to answer is this: Would that same guy been viewed as a savage if he were walking down the streets of New York today. My guess is that he would fit in nicely. Put a latte in his hand and no one would even notice him. I also suspect that if that savage in Melville’s book came to faith, God would have gladly used his tattooed body to display His love to all the other savages around town.
2. Colsen goes on to argue that tattoos point to things in which we place our identity. I find this to be a real stretch. I wear a Bass Pro hat almost all the time but I do not find my identity in Bass Pro or even in fishing. Just because someone has a tattoo of a flower or dragon on their body does not mean their identity is tied to that thing. Most people understand this to be common sense.
3. For Christians who get Christiany tattoos, Colsen calls us to live it out rather than to carve it onto our bodies. He tells us (and rightly so), “…the marks of a Christian ought to be spiritual…” I agree with him completely when it comes to living out our faith. But this is not really an argument against tattoos. I agree that the one thing that should set me apart the most is my lifestyle. However, this does not mean that I cannot also have a tattoo. Colsen seems to present this issue as an either/or argument. Either you live out your faith or you get a tattoo. But this is ridiculous. Of course we can do both. If I am living my life like Jesus, what difference does it make if I have a tattoo on my arm? And who knows, we might actually have a good conversation about our faith with unbelievers as a result of our tattoos (As I have had already…starting with the tattoo artist who did my tattoo).
4. Another argument Colson seems to make here refers to God’s preference. Colsen believes that God would prefer we not get tattoos. Colsen is using God’s preference as a trump card for lack of Biblical evidence in my opinion. It is an incredibly arrogant and foolish thing to presume God’s preference about something that has no Biblical backing. Colsen claims that he is not a legalist in this article. But this is the very heart of legalism; presuming God takes pleasure in ever more conservative interpretations of His Word. A legalist thinks along these lines: In order to be safe we should avoid. But Jesus thought along these lines: In order to love we should enter in.
So would Jesus get a tattoo? In the end I am not sure. However, I do know that all the religious leaders in Jesus day were furious with Him because he constantly broke away from religious culture in order to be with unbelievers. Jesus went to them. He spent time with tax collectors in their homes and he cared for prostitutes. He touched lepers. I have a feeling that Jesus would have gotten a tattoo if that is what it would have taken to reach even one single lost soul. In the end, Colsen’s article sounds more like the heart of those Pharisees than it does the heart of Jesus.